Talk:Micro-bug: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Detour (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TheMZone (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
If this is an excess to have this article, then remove it, it's fine. It's just the fact that it played a prominent role in the episode ''and'' it got a name call-out that makes me think it should have it's own article. [[User:TheMZone|TheMZone]] 20:40, 9 November 2010 (EST)
If this is an excess to have this article, then remove it, it's fine. It's just the fact that it played a prominent role in the episode ''and'' it got a name call-out that makes me think it should have it's own article. [[User:TheMZone|TheMZone]] 20:40, 9 November 2010 (EST)
:It should have a page... but said page needs to be properly formatted. Intro blurb, fiction section, categories, that little thing in italics that indicates what it is and which continuity it's from, etc. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 20:49, 9 November 2010 (EST)
:It should have a page... but said page needs to be properly formatted. Intro blurb, fiction section, categories, that little thing in italics that indicates what it is and which continuity it's from, etc. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 20:49, 9 November 2010 (EST)
::Thank you for clarifying. I was under the impression that smaller articles, like turbofox or dynametal duck, don't need formatting. Now are they the exception, or in need of cleanup?

Revision as of 05:30, 10 November 2010

If this is an excess to have this article, then remove it, it's fine. It's just the fact that it played a prominent role in the episode and it got a name call-out that makes me think it should have it's own article. TheMZone 20:40, 9 November 2010 (EST)

It should have a page... but said page needs to be properly formatted. Intro blurb, fiction section, categories, that little thing in italics that indicates what it is and which continuity it's from, etc. --Detour 20:49, 9 November 2010 (EST)
Thank you for clarifying. I was under the impression that smaller articles, like turbofox or dynametal duck, don't need formatting. Now are they the exception, or in need of cleanup?