For safety reasons: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Derik (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Hooper X (talk | contribs)
FINE I'LL FUCKING REWRITE IT.
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Cereal.jpg|thumb|250px|In Japan, kids get sharp fragments of Fortress Maximus in their breakfast cereal.]]
[[Image:Cereal.jpg|thumb|250px|In Japan, kids get sharp fragments of Fortress Maximus in their breakfast cereal.]]
For some reason, [[Hasbro]] has gotten it into their heads that they don't want kids hurting themselves with Transformers toys, particularly kids whose parents are likely to make a big fuss about it on the news or sue over it, nor do they want to get in legal trouble for breaking laws.  As a result, they put all products through clearly worthless testing in an attempt to make them safe for kids, and sometimes plan around "safety" rules or change existing toys to fit them.  Both of these are filed under the collective heading of things done '''for safety reasons.'''  Which is stupid.  I mean, I personally only occasionally hurt myself on my toys as a kid, so that obviously means it's a non-issue, right?
The United States is a very litigious society.  If a child is injured, or heaven forbid, killed by use or abuse of a toy, that child's parents are very likely to sue the toy manufacturer.  As such, [[Hasbro]] puts its toys through rigorous safety testing.  Sometimes, a toy has to be altered from the original design in order to maintain safety standards, which vary from country to country.  


==Safety testing==
==Safety testing==
Hasbro has several tests that come up frequently.  One of the more famous ones is the "drop test," which is an evil procedure devised purely as an excuse to not release [[Fortress Maximus (RID)|Fortress Maximus]] in [[Robots in Disguise (toyline)|RiD]].  Essentially, they don't want to release a toy that will shatter into dangerous plastic shards when you drop it onto a hard floor from more than a few feet off the ground.  But that's totally wrongIf you're dumb enough to do anything with a Fortress Maximus other than let it sit on a shelf collecting dust, like play with it or transform it or be in the process of moving it ''onto'' a shelf or something, then you deserve whatever harm comes to you.
Hasbro has several tests that come up frequently.  One of the more famous ones is the "drop test."  As its name implies, this involves dropping a toy from great heights in order to ascertain whether or not said toy will break, and if any of the parts which may have broken loose could potentially injure a child (sharp edges, swallowable/chokeable bits, etc.).  This is often cited as the reason [[Fortress Maximus (RID)|Fortress Maximus]] has not been reissued in the United States.   


Other tests typically have similar goals, and result in Hasbro not releasing other various toys or in various changes being made to Hasbro's versions of products compared to [[Takara]]'s versionsSo of course only Takara cares about the fans.  Sure, the ''[[Cybertron (franchise)|Galaxy Force]]'' version of [[Vector Prime]]'s wings are an accident waiting to happen, but they're ''painted'', and paint is way more important than the physical well-being of children, right?  It's not like toys are ''for'' kids or anything.
Other tests have similar goals, generally concerned with breakage issuesHence, the Japanese version of [[Vector Prime]] has hard plastic wings, but the U.S. version uses a rubbery material less likely to accidentally gouge out an eye.  Even as early as 1985, [[Jetfire]] was altered to have a blunted nosecone, and the [[Seeker]] jets had rubber nosecones instead of hard plastic.  Again, this was likely to prevent trauma from a thrown or jabbed toy.


==Safety standards==
==Safety standards==
In addition to testing, Hasbro feels the need to make toys conform to certain rules in terms of design.  Some of these are self-imposed, so obviously there must be no good reason for them because we all know better than Hasbro how toys should be designed, while others are laws mandated by national or other governments, so obviously there must be no good reason for them because governments are stupid.
Besides the safety testing, Hasbro (and other toy manufacturers) try to make sure their products conform to certain standards.  Some of these standards are self-imposed, while others are mandated at the state or national level.  Most notably, these laws include choke laws, which are designed to prevent small parts from being lodged in a child's windpipe; and toy gun laws, which are designed to prevent scenarios where law enforcement officials accidentally shoot children or adults who are not armed, but carrying "realistic" toy guns (like say, [[Megatron (G1)|G1 Megatron]].  U.S. law requires that toy guns have either an orange plug in the barrel, or a coat of orange paint on the barrel.  Some states have even more stringent laws, which requires that toy guns must be brightly colored and must not resemble real-world firearms.


The most famous case of stupid rules interfering with the toys Hasbro owes us is that of [[Megatron (G1)|Megatron]].  First, in the [[United States]], if you want to sell a toy gun, you have to put an orange cap at the end of it to annoy the fans.  This is apparently to keep police officers from mistaking them for real guns and shooting stupid kids who dared to play with their toys.  To make matters worse, some states have even more strict laws towards this same end, saying toy guns have to look unrealistic and be brightly colored in addition to having the stupid orange cap.  Between the two of them, [[Generation 1|G1]] Megatron cannot be reissued, and [[Classics (2006)|Classics]] Megatron had to be all [[neon]] and [[Playskool]].  Which is just totally wrong. After all, what's more important, the lives of some dumb kids or my hard-earned display piece?
==Trivia==
According to Hasbro, toys that represent flying characters are given more stringent drop tests, as children are more prone to throwing these figures around.


[[Category:Toys]]<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>
[[Category:Toys]]<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Revision as of 03:49, 18 December 2006

File:Cereal.jpg
In Japan, kids get sharp fragments of Fortress Maximus in their breakfast cereal.

The United States is a very litigious society. If a child is injured, or heaven forbid, killed by use or abuse of a toy, that child's parents are very likely to sue the toy manufacturer. As such, Hasbro puts its toys through rigorous safety testing. Sometimes, a toy has to be altered from the original design in order to maintain safety standards, which vary from country to country.

Safety testing

Hasbro has several tests that come up frequently. One of the more famous ones is the "drop test." As its name implies, this involves dropping a toy from great heights in order to ascertain whether or not said toy will break, and if any of the parts which may have broken loose could potentially injure a child (sharp edges, swallowable/chokeable bits, etc.). This is often cited as the reason Fortress Maximus has not been reissued in the United States.

Other tests have similar goals, generally concerned with breakage issues. Hence, the Japanese version of Vector Prime has hard plastic wings, but the U.S. version uses a rubbery material less likely to accidentally gouge out an eye. Even as early as 1985, Jetfire was altered to have a blunted nosecone, and the Seeker jets had rubber nosecones instead of hard plastic. Again, this was likely to prevent trauma from a thrown or jabbed toy.

Safety standards

Besides the safety testing, Hasbro (and other toy manufacturers) try to make sure their products conform to certain standards. Some of these standards are self-imposed, while others are mandated at the state or national level. Most notably, these laws include choke laws, which are designed to prevent small parts from being lodged in a child's windpipe; and toy gun laws, which are designed to prevent scenarios where law enforcement officials accidentally shoot children or adults who are not armed, but carrying "realistic" toy guns (like say, G1 Megatron. U.S. law requires that toy guns have either an orange plug in the barrel, or a coat of orange paint on the barrel. Some states have even more stringent laws, which requires that toy guns must be brightly colored and must not resemble real-world firearms.

Trivia

According to Hasbro, toys that represent flying characters are given more stringent drop tests, as children are more prone to throwing these figures around.