Talk:Toy swapping: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Lonegamer78 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<nowiki>*</nowiki>forehead smack* Protected the wrong bit of the page! - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 20:01, 28 May 2009 (EDT) | <nowiki>*</nowiki>forehead smack* Protected the wrong bit of the page! - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 20:01, 28 May 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Eh, you cool, Chris. I fixed it.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:07, 28 May 2009 (EDT) | :Eh, you cool, Chris. I fixed it.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:07, 28 May 2009 (EDT) | ||
[http://www.allspark.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=62666 Bleargh001] found another case, this one Human Alliance Bee and Sam, where Bee's replaced with something else. --[[User:Lonegamer78|Lonegamer78]] 23:27, 18 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 03:27, 19 September 2009
Does anyone think this page should be semi-protected or something? I mean, it's been "enhanced" a few times in the span of 2 days (probably by the self entitled douche bags the article speaks of). What's the consensus?--AWT88 19:47, 28 May 2009 (EDT)
- Autoconfirm seems appropriate here. If someone has the balls to remove the line about toy-swapping being "undesirable," let them register for a screen name so we can mock them to their face. -Derik 19:51, 28 May 2009 (EDT)
- Sounds like a much better plan to me.--AWT88 19:55, 28 May 2009 (EDT)
*forehead smack* Protected the wrong bit of the page! - Chris McFeely 20:01, 28 May 2009 (EDT)
- Eh, you cool, Chris. I fixed it.--RosicrucianTalk 20:07, 28 May 2009 (EDT)
Bleargh001 found another case, this one Human Alliance Bee and Sam, where Bee's replaced with something else. --Lonegamer78 23:27, 18 September 2009 (EDT)
