Talk:Solar Needle: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
New page: ==Solar harvester note== In the Revenge of the Fallen (film) film itself, it seemed to me that the AllSpark was de-emphasized to the point where the solar harvester was simply a g... |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
In the [[Revenge of the Fallen (film)]] film itself, it seemed to me that the AllSpark was de-emphasized to the point where the [[solar harvester]] was simply a general energy gathering device that The Fallen needed to energize his army. I don't think there was any talk of the purpose of the harvester was to energize the AllSpark (like in the comics), but I could be wrong. - [[User:Starfield|Starfield]] 22:36, 14 October 2009 (EDT) | In the [[Revenge of the Fallen (film)]] film itself, it seemed to me that the AllSpark was de-emphasized to the point where the [[solar harvester]] was simply a general energy gathering device that The Fallen needed to energize his army. I don't think there was any talk of the purpose of the harvester was to energize the AllSpark (like in the comics), but I could be wrong. - [[User:Starfield|Starfield]] 22:36, 14 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Two points<br>1) Official fiction says that the harvesters repowered the AllSpark, therefore, it is a legitimate function of the device.<br>2)...Why is this being discussed on this page? -- [[User:SFH|SFH]] 01:14, 15 October 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 05:14, 15 October 2009
Solar harvester note
In the Revenge of the Fallen (film) film itself, it seemed to me that the AllSpark was de-emphasized to the point where the solar harvester was simply a general energy gathering device that The Fallen needed to energize his army. I don't think there was any talk of the purpose of the harvester was to energize the AllSpark (like in the comics), but I could be wrong. - Starfield 22:36, 14 October 2009 (EDT)
- Two points
1) Official fiction says that the harvesters repowered the AllSpark, therefore, it is a legitimate function of the device.
2)...Why is this being discussed on this page? -- SFH 01:14, 15 October 2009 (EDT)
