Talk:For safety reasons: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Suki Brits (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think this does indeed have way too much snark. In fact, I would say that it shouldn't have ''any'' snark. Articles like this one could be valuable to have to point people to when the subject comes up, and, in my opinion, would therefore be far better off if made completely straight forward and joke-free. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 00:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | I think this does indeed have way too much snark. In fact, I would say that it shouldn't have ''any'' snark. Articles like this one could be valuable to have to point people to when the subject comes up, and, in my opinion, would therefore be far better off if made completely straight forward and joke-free. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 00:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
:Hrm, i enjoy a '''little''' snark. Maybe jsut in the intro, and gets serious in the sub-sections? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 00:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | :Hrm, i enjoy a '''little''' snark. Maybe jsut in the intro, and gets serious in the sub-sections? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 00:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
I'm not going to say that snark is bad, but yes, this is definitely over the top. A bit of editing all around is in order. --[[User:Suki Brits|Suki Brits]] 01:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | |||
Revision as of 01:45, 29 November 2006
I think this does indeed have way too much snark. In fact, I would say that it shouldn't have any snark. Articles like this one could be valuable to have to point people to when the subject comes up, and, in my opinion, would therefore be far better off if made completely straight forward and joke-free. --KilMichaelMcC 00:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hrm, i enjoy a little snark. Maybe jsut in the intro, and gets serious in the sub-sections? -Derik 00:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm not going to say that snark is bad, but yes, this is definitely over the top. A bit of editing all around is in order. --Suki Brits 01:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
