Talk:Prowl 2

What the fuck, Derik? —Interrobang 21:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

...do you not think Prowl 2 needs an article? -Derik 21:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't even understand what that was about. -- SFH 21:46, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Read, learn. -Derik 21:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Skimming the booklet, it looks like "Prowl 2" ended up as just a new body for Prowl, and is not meaningfully a separate character. It should probably be handled in Prowl's article. JW 22:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Amazingly actually reading the booklet yields a different result than skimming it. -Derik 22:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Given my apparent lack of reading skills, I would appreciate it if you would give us a summary of your reasons for creating this page. JW 22:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Okay! Summary follows:

He's a separate character from Prowl.

Summary ends. -Derik 22:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I took the time to read it more thoroughly. The Prowl described there is A) a copy of Prowl's consciousness, previously stored on a computer, plus B) a human (Chip Chase) in a symbiotic relationship with him, right?

Ergo, it's a lot like Powermaster Optimus Prime as he appeared in the G1 comics, who we don't consider to be a separate character. Heck, given that we still consider the Prime from Marvel Comics issue 80 to be the same character (a Last Autobot-empowered reincarnation of Prime, based on Hi-Q, based on Powermaster Optimus Prime, who in turn was made from a floppy disc copy of the original Prime), I don't think Prowl 2 warrants a new page. It's the same guy as Prowl. JW 22:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

That would be a completely adequate explanation if we didn't have this guy and the original Prowl running around simultaneously, as different individuals, in two separate places in continuity.

And also if, you know, we hadn't actually gotten a toy called 'Prowl 2.' -Derik 22:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, heck, dude, if you'd said that in the first place, instead of being all coy . . . JW 22:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

...Isn't it implied by creating an article for him? Guys who aren't separate characters don't get one. -Derik 22:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

The poop jokes and "I may be high at the moment" summary did not foster faith in your judgment. I am now reassured. JW 02:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Beast Wars Sourcebook heavily implies that Transmetal 2 Prowl is Binaltech Prowl in a new body, while Prowl from Magnaboss is the original Ark crewman in a new body. Yes, Ben Yee has made this a royal clusterfuck, but it's a canonical clusterfuck now.--Rosicrucian^Talk 22:30, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

WhY mY HEad hURt? -- SFH 22:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I know I'm only inviting a headache by asking, but... why is RID Prowl 2 in this? --M Sipher 23:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Was Binaltech Prowl actually called "Prowl 2"? --KilMichaelMcC 23:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

The Blue one? I believe so. --FFN 23:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

What I mean to ask was, "was the toy was actually sold under the name Prowl 2"? The link to the Binaltech booklet translation Derik provides above says mentions that in the storyline the Binaltech Prowl body was originally developed to be a GT "parallel form" labelled "Prowl 2," but that plan was scrapped and that body became BT Prowl/Chip's main body. But was the character actually referred to as "Prowl 2" anywhere? Derik mentions above that we've "gotten a toy called Prowl 2"... but I think he may just be referring to the RiD toy, which he seems to think is the same character for some reason. --KilMichaelMcC 00:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Nah, the toy itself was just called Prowl. I think Prowl 2 came from the BT storyline. --FFN 00:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I see nothing to indicate that Owl Prowl is the RID guy in Owl Prowl's IDW writeup. Small miracles. --ItsWalky 01:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

As a note, Owl Prowl's page should be moved to Prowl II, apparently, as that's how his IDW profile writes his name. Not with a 2. --ItsWalky 02:22, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

I think Prowl 2 is the same character because he is the same character. From the BWTF.com translation;

At first, the Honda-designed BT-15 model was developed for this project to become the parallel form "Prowl 2," but because Prowl's original body was destroyed before the GT network was activated, it was decided that BT-15 would function as his primary unit.

Remember, in japan Rid/CR takes place during G1. It's cracked- but RiD Prowl 2 is considered a G1 character in Japan. They're the same guy. -Derik 02:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Here's what's confusing me: It says that the BT Prowl body was originally designed to be a GT-unit called "Prowl 2," but that that plan was scrapped and it became Prowl/Chip's body instead. Where does it say that the Prowl/Chip character was actually called "Prowl 2"? --KilMichaelMcC 02:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

From Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki, a Wikia wiki.