Talk:Starscream clone (Animated)
"G1 redeco will be a store exclusive"
Any idea which store will be getting the exclusive? Perhaps Target because they got the movie g1 starscream redeco?--Skyglide 16:34, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- I put in that piece of trivia, and I don't know which store will carry it. all I've been told was that the guys at BotCon said they will release the mold in all the shown color schemes (and what I read they had shown Starscream together with his clones, which were in G1 seeker colors of Thundercracker, Skywarp and Starscream), and that the one in G1 SS colors would be a store exclusive, they also said that they love bringing out the seeker mold of each line in all three color variations.Dead Metal 13:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Army-Building reference in the trivia
- The Starscream clones clearly only exist to sell toys
I think that is prefect for the trivia. The fact that there is a lot of seemingly same deco(A) starscreams makes it seem like hasbro is encouraging army building of the Starscream figure. The fact that because of the movie line, the toys and episode doesn't line up seems irrelevant to me. As does A Prime Problem. We are all very aware that the fictions only purpose is to sell toys. If in the fiction there are numerous identical starscreams, I think the connection is obvious.
--Skyglide 23:19, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- There is no reason to believe that the clone army is a toy-sales-driven move. We've seen no altered-color-clone redecoes announced, which would be the big indicator... and at this stage, odds are appropriate redecoes would be created-after-the-fact items like the Premium movie toys. I really can't fathom Hasbro going "hey Marty, make Starscream clone himself so we can encourage multiple-buying of this one toy." It is far, far, FAR more likely that the genesis of the clone story is the simple "wouldn't it be neat to reference this thing that happened in G1, just like how Starscream died but came back". To claim unambiguously that it's a toy-sales-driven move is weak and tenuous at best. "To sell toys" is kind of dependent on "toy first". If Hasbro REALLY wanted to go that route, one of the clones would have been Skywarp, who we HAVE seen officialy announced as a toy... and Hasbro said he wasn't intended to be a show character. --M Sipher 04:49, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- And, sad to say, it's the most logical approach to a bunch of guys with the same body type. Bit more interesting take on it than G1, even. Having an army of them has an in-story purpose, and having them all resemble Starscream is easily explained by his vanity. This being a continuity that, aside from some noteworthy exceptions, has largely unique body types for each character.--RosicrucianTalk 05:27, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- I guess I see your point M Sipher. I still believe it should be noted somewhere that that photo I labeled (a) seems to encourage army-building. I now think my phrasing it as "clearly only exist" is probably wildly inaccurate, but again i think it should be noted. Also, i think that when the writers where coming up with the story for Animated, they probably expected the toys releases to coincide with airing. Like Soundwave being in wave 2 since he appeared late in season 1. Stupid Allspark Power line, I blame you for all my problems!
Also, Rosicrucian, i am not quite sure which side you are supporting :/
cheers!--Skyglide 22:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- I am saying that even on the chance that this is "to sell toys" it has more solid fictional support than... well... nearly all past Seeker redecos.--RosicrucianTalk 15:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think we should add this to Trivia instead.
- Starscream is clearly an Army Builder.
- And is the Yoda quote really needed here? We're using it as the caption on the pic in the Fist Full of Energon Main article.Shadow Mask Prime 12:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Clone V clone
Ok, I checked. Terms like drone or jet or whatever are always started with a capital. In fact I couldn't find one similar themed page where all the words didn't have capitals in em User:GWolfv2 15.51 May26th
- EVERY ARTICLE ON THE WIKI starts with a capital letter. But if subsequent terms in the article title are not proper nouns, they stay lower case. This is a well established policy (see Category:Nameless things for some examples.) Quit tryin' to fight it. -- Repowers 15:06, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Clearly it should be lowercase. however, shouldn't it be Starscream clones since the article talks about more then one? i mean after all it is an army of them. and the page goes into further detail about specific ones.--Skyglide 22:25, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yes and no. Yes in that it would be more logical, no in that everything's put in the singular so that you can type [[Starscream clone]]s to produce Starscream clones as a link, but would have to do [[Starscream clones|Starscream clone]] if it was the other way around. It sacrifices the logical page title for ease of linking (not a convention I agree with, but one well established...) - SanityOrMadness 15:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
G1 references
I'm not sure we should put those in for these guys, unless we get something beyond coloring (hopefully, they'll get real names when released as toys, or at least much better clues) - I mean, the coloring doesn't even fit that well for either of them (G1 Starscream definitely wasn't brickred/brown, and Skywarp has, if anything, reversed coloring), and they don't seem to share any personality similarities either.
Plus, the Clone that fits Skywarp the best looks like it appears as part of the whole army, anyway.KrytenKoro 02:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Spongescream and Patrick
Was Starscream forgetting Bulkhead's name supposed to be a joke about how they are best friends on SBSQ? Or was it a reference to when Starscream first appeared, and I'm just crazy?KrytenKoro 02:50, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
