Talk:Generation 1 continuity family

I thought it might be better to separate US and Japan out by columns, to visualize each better. Like this, only maybe without using the featuredchracters template.

(Numbers indicate order of appearance.)

United States	Japan
The Transformers (Later called Generation 1) Transformers: Generation 2 Machine Wars Beast Wars Beast Machines Universe (2003) Alternators Classics Universe (2008) Generation 1 series Classic series Generation 2 series Beast Wars series Beast Machines series War Within series	Generation 1 Fight! Super Robot Lifeform Transformers Transformers 2010 The Headmasters Super-God Masterforce Victory Zone Return of Convoy Operation Combination Transformers: Generation 2 Beast Wars Beast Wars II Beast Wars Neo Beast Machines Heroes of Cybertron Binaltech Robot Masters Kiss Players Henkei! Henkei!

- Starfield 09:17, 14 May 2009 (EDT)

I like the idea. ^^ --TX55^TALK 10:08, 14 May 2009 (EDT)

Not bad. Although I'm wondering about Henkei's placement. I prefer that it's by itself, like CR originally was before Takara's retconning. Unless someone can give me an explanation as to why Henkei should be with the G1 continuity family, given how we have:

Somewhat unbelievably for Japan, it presents the Henkei! universe as a new continuity, rather than shoehorning it somewhere into the cartoon continuity.

...in the toyline page. --Lonegamer78 15:06, 14 May 2009 (EDT)

It is in the G1 Continuity family, but not the cartoon continuity. The characters are G1 characters in the new Henkei universe. - Starfield 15:11, 14 May 2009 (EDT)

...that'll do. --Lonegamer78 17:08, 14 May 2009 (EDT)

Wasn't Beast Machines called "Beast Wars Returns" in Japan? - SanityOrMadness 20:24, 22 May 2009 (EDT)

Franchise identifiers

Previously, for articles in Generation 1 cartoon fiction, the franchise identifier would be worded:

[...] from the cartoon portion of the Generation 1 continuity family.

However this article's disambig suggests that the Generation 1 bit should link to here, or possibly that it should be worded:

[...] from the cartoon portion of the The Transformers franchise in the Generation 1 continuity family.

But that seems a bit wordy. Comments? --abates 18:03, 22 May 2009 (EDT)

Well, that's how characters like Jhiaxus (G2), Rattrap, etc get treated. If you think that's wordy, look at the top of Optimus Primal. - SanityOrMadness 20:24, 22 May 2009 (EDT)

Rattrap doesn't have the "cartoon portion" bit because he's in multiple parts of the Beast Era. Chak and Una are a better representation of what I'm talking about, since they were only in the Beast Wars cartoon. If I have my logic right, their franchise identifier should read:

Chak and Una are a pair of protohumans from the cartoon portion of the Beast Wars franchise in the Generation 1 continuity family.

But hey, that's still shorter than Optimus Primal's identifier, so maybe it's not so wordy after all. :) --abates 06:22, 23 May 2009 (EDT)

Historical or retconned franchise identifiers.

Concerning Jackpot's edit. I like the original franchise identifiers in this list instead of the retconned ones. I think it is appropriate in this list to call them what they were at the time. It is like a historical record that way. - Starfield 22:52, 2 June 2009 (EDT)

I'll respond to the easy one first: I took "Transformers" off of "Transformers: Generation 2" because that's what we do with every series/franchise, and there's nothing special about G2 in that regard. It doesn't have anything to do with original names and retcons; it's just a convenient shorthand to avoid unnecessary clutter.

As for "The Transformers" vs. "Generation 1", I see where you're going with the original-name argument, but I think that that only truly applies to individual products (such as The Transformers (toyline) and The Transformers (cartoon)). The G1 franchise by its nature is a backwards-looking concept; before G2, the idea of a "franchise" as we're discussing it didn't really exist. There was no intermediary step between the brand and the products. When G2 appeared, it created a void behind itself at its own hierarchical layer. Then when the pre-G2 era started making a comeback in the form of e-Hobby exclusives and so forth, the term "Generation 1" gained official traction, and it smoothly filled the void of the nameless franchise-before-franchises. The way I see it, it's not really as though the franchise had an "original name" that "G1" has superseded; "G1" is filling a vacuum where nothing had existed at all. Moreover, when I see something labeled "The Transformers", I only think of things that ended fully with G2. But the franchise referred to in that link includes lots of stuff in the modern era, so I think the modern term "G1" is a better label.

Lastly, I think consistency within the wiki is important when we're dealing with such wide-spanning, multi-definitioned terms as "G1" and "The Transformers", so in this case I'd go with simplicity. I acknowledge that you were trying to give due respect to both terms in your wording, but I'm not sure it's worth it here.

- Jackpot 01:45, 3 June 2009 (EDT)