Talk:Multi-component Transformer

I realize everything about this article is questionable: the title, the definition, the list of things that should be included, and even whether the article should exist or not. But it seems like a valid concept to Transformerdom, even if it has been vaguely defined. I thought I'd give it a first draft knowing it might need major revisions. (Starfield logged out) - 69.14.126.15 23:44, 2 June 2009 (EDT)

It's not a bad topic to cover, if only to examine how incredibly little has been done with the concept in fiction, despite its recurrence over the years. I think "Multi-component Transformers" might be a bit less awkward as a title. -- Repowers 12:36, 3 June 2009 (EDT)

Multilocational is odd-enough sounding I think it comes off like a real term until you read the article. (At least I assumed the term had been used somewhere until I actually looked.)

Agree on a need to move to a better title, but ti seems like a decent concept for an article. -Derik 12:45, 3 June 2009 (EDT)

"Multi-component Transformers" sounds pretty good, except in one sense, all Transformers have multiple components, if you count gears and servos, and all the normal components that make up a Transformer. - Starfield 14:45, 3 June 2009 (EDT)