Talk:Buffalo MPV Decepticon

Buhwha? Merge?

Bonecrusher was decapitated. Onscreen, no less.--Rosicrucian^Talk 12:51, 1 July 2009 (EDT)

No body=not dead, apparently. He's alive on-screen. His body wasn't among those dumped in the ocean. Frenzy was decapitated too. Transformers are hard to really kill dead. See also Talk:Bonecrusher (Movie). - Starfield 12:57, 1 July 2009 (EDT)

Frenzy is specifically noted as having a decentralized nervous system and numerous redundancies. His ability to survive dismemberment is fairly unique.--Rosicrucian^Talk 13:03, 1 July 2009 (EDT)

Well scratch that part then. - Starfield 13:20, 1 July 2009 (EDT)

Aside from Frenzy, decapitation/head destruction seems to be the best way to kill a Decepticon, as it's the method Optimus Prime uses 90% of the time. --Detour 15:41, 1 July 2009 (EDT)

Having this page begs the question of whether or not to split all the other constructicons into multiple pages i.e. the red and yellow rampages. seems more sensible to just put a note on bonecrusher's page. Cliffjumper prime 12:54, 1 July 2009 (EDT)

not to mention "Mine-protected vehicle" could be replaced with a better name... sounds like it's covered in mines. Cliffjumper prime 12:56, 1 July 2009 (EDT)

Bonecrusher isn't a Constructicon. Eire July 1 09 (UTC)

That's the technical term for the vehicle. There isn't a better name for it. It's a Buffalo mine-protected vehicle.--Rosicrucian^Talk 17:56, 1 July 2009 (EDT)

regardless, I stand by my first statement. Making a separate page for this guy is the same as making a separate page for the red rampage. it's just not necessary. Cliffjumper prime 18:04, 1 July 2009 (EDT)

The wiki has no real problem with pages for minor characters even if they have no name. - Starfield 22:37, 1 July 2009 (EDT)

There is NO reason whatsover to assume that this guy is Bonecrusher from the first movie. I don't know if this warrants a page of its own, but it definitely DOES NOT belong on Bonecrusher's page. He hates that. 72.128.60.173 19:44, 1 July 2009 (EDT)

Agreed. We have no indication that it is Bonecrusher and we know that Transformers of the same body appear in the movies (Constructicons, Grindor). However I'm not sure this really warrants a page. A small note on the ROTF page I think would be enough. --Bluestreak7 22:33, 1 July 2009 (EDT)

It's a little strong to say there is "no" indication it is Bonecrusher, but I see most everyone disagrees. I removed the merge tag. - Starfield 22:46, 1 July 2009 (EDT)

Clearly there isn't a consensus on this. This article needs a note that this character may in fact be Bonecrusher, but we're covering him as a seperate character until there's some clarification. -Derik 22:54, 1 July 2009 (EDT)

And on the "does not deserve his own article" we have articles for TFs that are only mentioned by name once and have no other fictional appearance opther then being mentioned, and we even have an article about a TF that does not exist. So yea this guy here deserves his own page. Dead Metal 04:15, 2 July 2009 (EDT)

Personally I think ILM got lazy creating a new bot and just reused Bonecrusher. Wasn't Brawl's tank mode sighted aswell? 68.9.247.42 14:19, 20 July 2009 (EDT)