Category talk:Featured articles
Process
Is there a process for deciding what gets to be considered a Featured Article, or is it basically "Whatever the admins like this month?" -- G1MarvelBlaster 11:29, 8 December 2009 (EST) (Who may be lobbying to get Target: 2006 Featured Article status.)
- Bring it up here, and if it's finished enough we'll throw the tag up on it. --ItsWalky 12:05, 8 December 2009 (EST)
- And if it's not finished enough, and you can get a few people excited about it, a push can be made to get it up to snuff.--RosicrucianTalk 13:16, 8 December 2009 (EST)
- Yeah, we usually use imminent end-of-the-month deadlines to push Almost There articles into completion. It's a pretty good tool! Something finished a long while ago is much less likely to be Featured for a particular month for that reason, since if we already have something ready to go, there's no drive to finish another article. --ItsWalky 15:12, 27 December 2009 (EST)
- And if it's not finished enough, and you can get a few people excited about it, a push can be made to get it up to snuff.--RosicrucianTalk 13:16, 8 December 2009 (EST)
February 2010
Hrm. Do we have any suitable (or near-suitable) Wreckers-related articles we could throw up there? --Jeysie 20:03, 29 January 2010 (EST)
- Springer is mighty close, IMO. -hx 21:07, 29 January 2010 (EST)
- I agree. I've done some minor edits to Springer's article (Sticker book and added a few Marvel UK pictures) but I don't have access to TFCC material so I can't fill that out. I am willing to dive into the Dreamwave stuff and expand that section in the morning. Who else wants to help with that? -- G1MarvelBlaster 02:38, 31 January 2010 (EST) (Though it might end up being a March FA considering the date)
/* Dark of the Moon film */
Shockwave from DOTM should be made a featured article. There is a lot of info on that article
Missing
Multiplie articles that were labeled as afeatured articles are no longer on the list. Why?Mojotron 06:54, 29 March 2012 (EDT)
- Examples? - Chris McFeely 07:09, 29 March 2012 (EDT)
- Megatron (Prime), Optimus Prime (Prime), Galvatron (G1), and there's probably more. - Mojotron 09:09, 31 March 2012 (EDT)
- Sometimes, a featured article might be just chosen because it's well timed to focus on that character or idea, like zombies at Halloween - Optimus, for example, was a quick choice made by me when we were several days late for changing the article, and I just threw him up because the Prime cartoon was returning that week and it seemed a good thematic tie-in, rather than because his was "one of the most informative articles". And look at Megatron - he's currently missing a write-up of Exiles and the Wii WFC game, and he and Galvatron are missing pictures for quite a few things. If the articles don't have the FA template on 'em, it's for a reason. (Not, mind you, that I'm sure there aren't some articles that were once FAs that haven't since slipped as time has gone on and now aren't as complete as they could be). - Chris McFeely 09:30, 31 March 2012 (EDT)
- Keeping articles for constantly updated characters like the Prime characters on the FA list is generally a bad idea. Inevitably, they'll become incomplete as people stop updating them. You can already see it happening with Megatron (Prime) and Ratchet (G1)'s IDW section. (And, holy crap, Megatron's WFC section really needs to be pruned.) —Interrobang 14:08, 31 March 2012 (EDT)
- Sometimes, a featured article might be just chosen because it's well timed to focus on that character or idea, like zombies at Halloween - Optimus, for example, was a quick choice made by me when we were several days late for changing the article, and I just threw him up because the Prime cartoon was returning that week and it seemed a good thematic tie-in, rather than because his was "one of the most informative articles". And look at Megatron - he's currently missing a write-up of Exiles and the Wii WFC game, and he and Galvatron are missing pictures for quite a few things. If the articles don't have the FA template on 'em, it's for a reason. (Not, mind you, that I'm sure there aren't some articles that were once FAs that haven't since slipped as time has gone on and now aren't as complete as they could be). - Chris McFeely 09:30, 31 March 2012 (EDT)
- Megatron (Prime), Optimus Prime (Prime), Galvatron (G1), and there's probably more. - Mojotron 09:09, 31 March 2012 (EDT)
Bringing this back up, pages like Ratchet's and most of Megatron's main page (discounting cartoon, IDW, toy, and Merchendise pages) are really lagging behind. I know I'm nowhere near good enough to do stuff beyond minor edits, but it just really bothers me to see that these are sort of lagging behind, and I want to do something about it. Escargon (talk) 14:56, 1 March 2014 (EST)
Possible Ironhide(G1)?
I know it may seem like personal bias with my profile and all, but does anyone else think Ironhide (G1) deserves a page? If people think he doesn't its fine, I think it would a good choice. Also, is a new one selected every month, maybe Ironhide is for May 2015(if there isn't another already). He is in the Hall of Fame. Heck, Wheelie has his own article featured. Ironhide had a much bigger impact on transformers than Wheelie. Let's get our old Deceptichop buster his rightful reward!(in my opinion). Tell people, let's get this cause to grow! IronhideG1 (talk) 19:31, 29 May 2015 (EDT)
- There's a lot on there that needs filling in. Bribe Chris McFeely? --abates (talk) 20:18, 29 May 2015 (EDT)
