Template talk:Factions/doc: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchRosicrucian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:The template differentiates the live-action Autobot faction ''symbol'' from the rest. It still points to [[Autobot]]. --[[User:FortMax|FortMax]] 21:14, 6 February 2010 (EST) | :The template differentiates the live-action Autobot faction ''symbol'' from the rest. It still points to [[Autobot]]. --[[User:FortMax|FortMax]] 21:14, 6 February 2010 (EST) | ||
::Yes, but I still don't see the need in re-templating all movie Autobots, and if we're going to do this we may as well for Decepticons as well.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:21, 6 February 2010 (EST) | ::Yes, but I still don't see the need in re-templating all movie Autobots, and if we're going to do this we may as well for Decepticons as well.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:21, 6 February 2010 (EST) | ||
:::It's hard to find a good Decepticon symbol. - [[User:Starfield|Starfield]] 21:26, 6 February 2010 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 02:26, 7 February 2010
Why do we need to differentiate live-action Autobots from the rest?--RosicrucianTalk 21:03, 6 February 2010 (EST)
- The template differentiates the live-action Autobot faction symbol from the rest. It still points to Autobot. --FortMax 21:14, 6 February 2010 (EST)
- Yes, but I still don't see the need in re-templating all movie Autobots, and if we're going to do this we may as well for Decepticons as well.--RosicrucianTalk 21:21, 6 February 2010 (EST)
- It's hard to find a good Decepticon symbol. - Starfield 21:26, 6 February 2010 (EST)
- Yes, but I still don't see the need in re-templating all movie Autobots, and if we're going to do this we may as well for Decepticons as well.--RosicrucianTalk 21:21, 6 February 2010 (EST)
